Previous Page  8 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

«

8

»

THE

INCOMPAS SHOW

I APRIL 10-13, 2016

www.bekapublishing.com

DAY 2

THE

INCOMPAS

SHOW

Wheeler said. “Both Chip Pickering and Verizon’s

Kathy Grillo deserve a special shout-out. … My own

views are in significant accord with your letter.”

Wheeler said finding common ground should

start with common sense, and “I believe the

principles I am supporting are firmly based in

the realities of the marketplace,” adding, “That

marketplace is changing – fast.”

He cited how new technologies offer IP-based

products alongside traditional legacy circuit-

based products and how new entrants are

playing a growing role in the BDS market.

“And the importance of business data

services to the economy is becoming ever more

important,” Wheeler said. “Think about wireless

competition today and the coming of 5G wireless

networks and the Internet of Things. According

to Intel, the number of connected smart devices

is going to increase from 15 billion in 2015 to

200 billion in 2020.”

Fifth-generation wireless trials have begun,

and the FCC is preparing to designate spectrum

for 5G this summer, Wheeler acknowledged,

saying that American leadership in this field is a

“national priority.”

“Without a healthy BDS market, we put at risk

the enormous opportunity for economic growth,

job creation and U.S. competitiveness that 5G

represents,” he added.

Wheeler said the FCC data as of 2013 show

competitive pathways – including cable – reach

less than 45 percent of locations where there is

demand. And while cable presence grows, some

locations are not benefiting from competition.

“For the Commission to be effective, our rules

must be based on market realities,” Wheeler

stated. “So we need a fresh start.”

That fresh start calls for broad principles

to find common ground for the Commission

to determine the best ways to act,” Wheeler

said, adding he wants the Commission to adopt

the proposed BDS framework this month and

conclude the proceeding by the end of the year.

“I assure you that I will treat this issue with

the urgency it deserves,” Wheeler said. “Where

competition exists, there is little for government

to do except to maintain the traditional over-

sight of telecommunications services; but where

competition does not exist, government’s role is

to ensure that non-competitive market conditions

cannot disadvantage business customers and

their ability to compete and innovate in down-

stream markets.”

Wheeler said the regulatory framework must be

technology-neutral, and that companies and tech-

nologies that deliver the same kind of BDS should

be treated the same. This means where “TDM and

IP deliver substitutable services, the market must

be judged by looking at both,” he explained.

However, he added the FCC still must

encourage the transition from TDM to IP.

“The supply of circuit-switched BDS is still big

business, but the future is in IP-based, packet-

switched communications,” Wheeler said.

It is why Wheeler has asked the FCC to vote to

declare unlawful contract terms used in a series

of tariffs that include so-called “all or nothing”

contracts that require a customer to make all of

its purchases on a single set of terms.

“Unfair contractual terms can both slow the

transition by customers away from TDM and to

IP and, by limiting the use of IP-based products

like Ethernet, actually discourage investment in

the construction of new BDS facilities,” he said.

Citing Harold Feld of Public Knowledge, who

likens BDS to crude oil, Wheeler said, “You

would never buy a barrel of oil, but the price of

crude impacts what you pay for almost all energy

services. The same can be said of business data

services. Business data services matter because

they are at the heart of virtually everything using

telecommunications.”

He also addressed set-top boxes as a

threat to what should be the golden era of

video competition, which is characterized by

consumers’ ability to mix and match the pack-

ages of programming they want from a single

provider or many over dedicated network facili-

ties, using the Internet or both.

“Ninety-nine percent of pay-TV customers lease

set-top boxes from their cable, satellite or telco

providers,” Wheeler said. “On average, consumers

are paying $231 a year to rent those boxes,

collectively $20 billion. Yes, despite Congress’s

mandate, they have no competitive choice.”

The FCC is out to correct that, Wheeler said.

“We believe our proposal clearly protects both

copyright and privacy, but if it can be made

better, we are open for suggestions. Clearly, it’s

in the public interest to introduce competition in

the set-top box marketplace.”

Wheeler also called for attendees to support

net neutrality.

“Access to the Internet may be the most impor-

tant commodity that exists today,” he said. “In an

economy built around information, broadband is

the key to individual and corporate opportunity.

Broadband must be fast, fair and open.

“Our approach to Internet openness is

simple,” he continued. “We must enforce the

bright-line rules for no blocking, no throttling and

no paid prioritization. We must ensure transpar-

ency. And we must apply the case-by-case stan-

dards in order to protect consumers from harm.”

The Chairman said he believes it is ironic

that the same organizations that complain the

open Internet rules aren’t sufficient also complain

about the Commission’s ability to create certainty

through “ex-post examination” of the market.

Wheeler emphasized one obvious principle

in the debate is one of the consistent under-

pinnings of FCC precedent for decades: “An

incumbent should not be able to use its position

as a gatekeeper to unfairly discriminate against

unaffiliated content or services that may, today

or tomorrow, pose a competitive threat to the

incumbent’s own business.”

Wheeler said it is time for a fresh start. So,

yes, it is time for a fresh start, but the fresh start

would be summed up with three words: Competi-

tion, Competition. Competition.

o

(Wheeler, continued from page 1)